Chris Chiozza – Washington: As a junior at the University of Florida, Chiozza pounced on the national scene when he hit a running three-pointer as time expired in overtime against Wisconsin at Madison Square Garden to send the Gators to the Elite Eight. I recall having Florida winning that game on my bracket, so my personal affinity for Chiozza grew out of that moment. As a senior last season, Chiozza had a good year, although there was something fundamentally wrong with the gators which never could really get them off the ground. Their lack of player movement offensively seemed to be an issue, often a lot of standing on the perimeter while a ball screen was happening, and not much shooting to boot. Was Chiozza part of the problem? He can often be ball dominant. His assist numbers, though often high, prove just how much he is the final decision maker. Similarly, this summer when playing for the Washington Wizards, he was second in summer league in assists with 7.4 a game, only behind Frank Mason with eight per game.
Chiozza has a great feel for the game and can be incredibly proactive with his ball movement too. He sees plays develop and often delivers the ball at the perfect time for teammates to make their own play. He has the ability to pass guys open. His inability to shoot the ball from the perimeter consistently is a problem. His shot selection is always pretty sound, but his 30% shooting in summer league did not help his case. His size is an issue defensively, although, by the eye test, he didn’t get exposed in the way one would think. He is tough, strong, and again, proactive in his ability to feel the game.
There is…something about Chiozza’s game which always makes me want to give him another look or give him another chance. Is his game actually better suited for the NBA? It very well could be, although that doesn’t mean he will be given the opportunity. But he is someone worth keeping an eye on, and someone who will undoubtedly be given a contract somewhere in the world. With an uptick in his shooting capabilities, Chiozza could be a serviceable back-up point guard in the league on day.
Jordan Mclaughlin – Brooklyn: This very cerebral point guard ran the Nets summer league team in a very professional way. As a four-year player at USC, Mclaughlin played with a maturity which was very becoming. His leadership intangibles connected his teammates, and his ability to score when he has to should not be scoffed at. The numbers do not tell the story. He averaged seven points and four assists per game in only 19 minutes of action. It’s the musicality and the ability to allow a random group of players to function properly is where Mclaughlin excels. Given that there were other USC players playing well in the summer league, it’s surprising their team didn’t make more of a splash last season the in NCAA. Nonetheless, Mclaughlin should be able to carve out a nice European career for himself, and perhaps could find an NBA situation down the line, if the timing is right. He seems more like a player who could contribute in the Turkish league – maybe even within the likes of a Pathotonikos or Fenerbahce size club.
Theo Pinson – Brooklyn: This guy is a top-notch person with a well-developed sense of humor and a player who has long ago succumb to the idea that basketball is about connecting to other people. Pinson has, for years, been one of my favorite college players on a team that I don’t particularly like watching, the University North Carolina. His feel for the game is just stunning, and he’s so well versed that he can get away with looking like he’s playing nonchalantly. He is always a step or two ahead of the action. He never gets sped up and is always looking to connect in his crafty ways and, like Mclaughlin, his contributions go far beyond the numbers.
In the Las Vegas summer league, Pinson led the Nets in minutes per game with 25, averaging 11 points and four rebounds and two assists per game. Numbers that won’t set the world on fire. Although Pinson is not a great shooter, he shot the ball nearly 50% from the field in summer league and made enough three-pointers to at least pose the question of whether or not he can shoot it sustainably. I am under the impression that in the right situation and with the right confidence, he is capable of producing far beyond whatever talent-ceiling he has been branded with to this point. He is a winner, who makes winning plays. If I had to compare him to anybody in the league right now, I would say he is a smaller (6’6) and less athletic Andre Iguodala. Pinson is the glue which keeps players communicating and connected. There was something in his energy during the summer league which made me feel as though he may not believe that an NBA opportunity will present itself for him, but I hope it does. He is a player I am unsure of for European basketball. His gifts are better served in an American setting, where his knowledge and feel can more easily exploit weaknesses of IQ and feel in his opponents. I’m not quite sure Europeans will appreciate his intangibles and may look to him to play an outsized scoring or raw data production role. On a very good NBA team, Pinson’s original gifts would be thrust to the forefront, as would a team’s win total.
Aaron Holiday – Indiana: This guy could end up being the steal of the draft and immediately become a franchise stabilizer at the point guard position. His summer league performance was more at ease than any other point guard I observed. His natural feel for the game and his inherent ability to make others around him better just oozed off the screen. He plays with an unusual confidence level that, undoubtedly, must have something to do with having two older brothers already playing in the NBA. His game is not unlike his brother Jrue, but Aaron is more undersized and relies a bit more on proactive ball movement to keep his internal metronome ticking. His shooting ability and moreover, his ability to create his own shot late in the shot clock is intriguing. As I’ve mentioned before, I was surprised with his scoring numbers at UCLA. He has a keen knack for scoring, while continuing to facilitate his team functioning at an optimal level. Last night I debated with someone whether or not Holiday or Sexton will have better NBA career’s, and I guess it wasn’t much of a debate since we both settled in Holiday. In closing, there is just an ease to the way he plays which makes everyone around him feel comfortable, including the audience watching the game. This is a major basketball player who will have an impact for years to come, and a very smart pick by the Indiana Pacers.
Trae Young – Atlanta: It took a long and windy text exchange with my friend Brad Botkin, an ascending sportswriter and television commentator for CBS Sports, to finally take some of the emotion out of my argument against Trae Young. Brad, who has much more of a macro argument for Young explained, “the kid can shoot and pass like crazy. That’s the only thing I’m sure of.”
So, my final argument is this: Trae Young’s style is divorced from the ingredients necessary to consistently win basketball games and, maybe more importantly, if Young’s style is not dramatically altered, it will repel teammates and cause friction in the team’s internal dynamics.
There was a brief moment after three days of the Las Vegas Summer league where the Atlanta Hawks led the league in three statistical categories. John Collins was leading in points per game with 30. Young led in assists with 11, and Tyler Dorsey randomly led the league in rebounds and minutes per game.
Ironically, for about the past nine months I’ve been harping about how, when Young was at Oklahoma and led the Nation in points and assists per game (which is incredible), Oklahoma could not consistently win basketball games with Young performing in such a communally bankrupt approach. As maligned as his teammates were by the media (some justified) and as complicit as Lon Kruger was in not finding ways to connect Young’s talent to his teammates, Young was not without blame. Young could have easily sacrificed 3-5 points per game, and even a few assists per game in order to bring out a higher functionality and connectivity with his teammates.
Look – I’ve been on Young’s case Hard, and riding him for, what I still believe are Very Specific Reasons – reasons which involve basketball’s inner-secrets and embedded spirituality. Earlier today, I briefly watched a “Details” segment Kobe Bryant did on Young, where Kobe spent the majority of the segment breaking down a ball-screen scenario Young performed in the Utah summer league. Although Young made the wrong read on this particular ball-screen, the play was an illustration of what I have felt ever since I began watching Young: He has the physical ability to be an incredibly effective guard, but he chooses to rather be fed by a pre-existing external narrative about how he should play, or an internal narrative about how he wants to play. Both are misleading, and a lot of his play throughout summer league is consistent with this notion.
Overall, based on the shooting numbers, Young was outrageously inefficient – but so are many young players in their first summer league experiences. Young ended up shooting about 30% (30-99) from the field. In the first few days of summer league, the only field goal attempts Young was converting were incredibly tough two-point field goals in the paint from isolated dribble penetration. He showed the ability to finish tough plays, but it also foreshadowed how unsustainable those finishes will be in the league. From a defensive perspective, that’s what you want to force Young to do. Make physically difficult two’s in the paint.
Throughout summer league, Young’s shot selection was consistently questionable at best, and usually divorced from the current flow of the game or possession. His shooting calculations were seemingly more based how many possessions it had been since the last time he shot it, or whether a certain switch on a matchup played to his ego. Many of Young’s decisions have nothing to do with what is happening in the moment. Often times when Young is making the right basketball plays it involves him making a pass – even a simple one.
Then, suddenly, he will make a great play – showcasing that he possesses the physical and mental ability to briefly unburden himself and make the plays which the current moment demands. Without having seen him in person, I’m suspecting those who have would attest to his unusual quickness, lightness on his feet, and how he rarely labors to get past a defender off the dribble.
Young biggest issue to date is that he has no genuine interest in connecting with his teammates. Even in “Details” clip, he showed a complete lack of connection with his teammates. Toward the end of the clip a teammate came to give him dap and Young, perhaps inadvertently, shrugged him off to gripe about something else affecting Him. He doesn’t talk on the floor. He doesn’t engage his teammates and encourage them. He doesn’t seem to view his teammates as equals. His entitlement reeks of a young guard who sees his teammates as pawns to help him in his branding endeavors.
Young came into the University of Oklahoma with an anointed disposition. His individualized style of play was magnetically so dissonant that he mainly attracted back to himself exactly that, dissonance. One must admit, there is a false magnetisms and dissonance when a player can lead the NCAA in points and assists, only to lose 12 of their last 16 games and get eliminated in the first round of a tournament where, really, they should not have been granted entrance.
The one time I have observed Young wanting to connect with his teammates was in their miraculous comeback in the game against Indiana in Las Vegas. Once he was subbed out midway through the third Atlanta finally started to play as a team. They quickly evaporated an over 20-point lead, and, to Young’s credit, he became engaged in the game from the bench in a way I had not seen. He was actually communicating with his teammates for once, cheering them on, and engaged himself in a collective energy which his teammates created. Once he entered back into the game late in the fourth, he was completely in the flow, made great plays, and Atlanta ended up winning by Young taking them across the finish line in crunch time.
But with all this said, I also want to address some of the talk in summer league regarding Young. In the words of the robotically short-circuited Marco Rubio, let us dispel with the notion that Trae Young is the next Steph Curry. Yeah, they are both undersized guards who can shoot from deep, handle, and have the ability to make thrilling passes. But aside from that there is Absolutely Nothing which the two have in common, especially energetically, spiritually, and in terms of their relationship with the Karma of the Game.
Young simply does not make others around him better yet, and I have not been under the impression that his teammates enjoy playing with him. The End.
As anticipated, Trae Young pranced around during warmups of the Atlanta versus Memphis game, pandered to every camera within range and, once the ball was tipped, continued to display his inability to connect to anything bigger than himself.
The play-by-play commentator of tonight’s game claimed that the Hawks coaches have been “impressed” by Young’s passing ability. Unfortunately for the city of Atlanta and the immediate future of the Hawks franchise, not only did Young’s passing ability not matter in this game –it may not matter in general moving forward.
Young went 1-11 from the three-point line, and 4 of 20 overall. As strange as it feels to write this, those numbers don’t even begin to tell the whole story.
Young continues to play to a pre-determined narrative rather than play the game which is unfolding before his legacy motivated eyes. There is a wide, long, and deep canyon between the way Young feels he should play, what his real talent level is, and what the objective reality is on the floor at the NBA level.
Young doesn’t yet grasp how often he was bailed out and even rewarded in college by making the wrong basketball plays. He would either get fouled, dominate the handle and eventually manufacture an assist opportunity for himself, or create and often make tough shots.
In the NBA, the definition of a wrong play does not have any correlation to its result. The model is grounded in data, individual skill, size and strength, and an understanding of intangibles. Most NBA coaches understand the importance of consciously involving teammates and hopefully, modeling how important it is to play to the game in a communal way. At least having an awareness that the true art of the game succumbing yourself to the game in order to get the most out of others.
None of this has happened yet for Young in his basketball life. The notion of giving up a little of oneself to get more inspiration out of others has likely never entered his mind before.
Pundits will make mention of how egregious the air-balls were on Young’s first two three-point attempts tonight but lost is the fact that both of those shots, regardless of their outcomes, were the wrong basketball plays and they were decisions which alienate people. Young needs all of these teammates in his corner, especially given the fact that he will struggle mightily throughout his rookie year.
I felt bad for the University of Oklahoma head coach Lon Kruger this past season. Young committed to Oklahoma as a native of the state – bringing with his decision much fanfare and personal entitlement having grown up supporting the Sooners. There was really nothing Kruger could do to keep him in check. Kruger is responsible for a portion of the blame. Oklahoma’s exit in the first round of the NCAA playoffs after basically not even qualifying on merit says a lot about the star power the NCAA felt Young possessed, but also the dynamics in which Young enters into the NBA equation.
Oklahoma was on a relatively talent depleted team, so getting Young to buy-into a team concept didn’t necessarily play into Oklahoma’s best interests. But by not forcing Young to buy-in and commit to contributing to the team’s deeper connectivity, Oklahoma basically became a four-month public NBA tryout for Young.
Early in the year, when Young was on an absolute scoring rampage, Oklahoma was winning games, but it was destined and proved to be fool’s gold. The negative equity in basketball karma which Young racked up historic numbers, were born out of a model completely stripped of musicality and was not connected to anything larger than Trae Young.
This is an issue he faces today and tomorrow and the next day. What I observe is that Young has no experience making others around him better and, from what I can tell, has no intrinsic motivation to do so.
Even the assists numbers at Oklahoma are misleading. Yes, of course, averaging 8.7 assists is very “impressive.” Leading the nation in scoring to boot with over 27 points per game is unbelievable. Many of his assists show his uncanny ability to read the floor, precise skill with both hands, and the ability to improvise and pass guys open.
With all that said, the ego dominant way in which he plays makes it incumbent that HE creates the assist, as opposed to fostering a deeper relationship amongst his teammates. Yeah, Oklahoma maybe scored the bucket, but little by little the inspiration of all his teammates died a slow death. Young’s statistics are the epitome of a player who is dominating the basketball experiences of his teammates.
Young’s 8.7 assists per game is prolific and could not be done without incredible talent and invention given his size, but there are many assists his teammates could’ve accrued if not for Young’s insistence on completely bogarting the flow of play. His teammates were not authors of their own stories, nor do they get a chance to contribute to Young’s story. He dictated what was going to be written, wrote for his teammates, and gave them quick cameos when he felt like it and damn it, they better perform well! Under this dynamic most players aren’t inspired to perform because to their highest capabilities because they are not in enough control of their own destiny, and player development is stymied when it is authorized by a teammate and not by a coach. Young’s style of play doesn’t enable his teammates to get a deeper understanding of what basketball is all about.
Nobody played well for Atlanta tonight apart from Omari Spellman and John Collins, the latter playing like a wily veteran after his rookie campaign last year. Spellman looked and played bigger than I anticipated and although he didn’t get his three-point shot dialed in, the looks he missed were stiff and justified. He seemed like he wanted to connect more than anybody else out there, and coming from Villanova’s style of play, having Young as a teammate is going to get old quick.
Contrast this with the Memphis Grizzlies, who looked very connected and defensively engaged. Jaren Jackson Jr. hit eight three-pointers on his way to 29 points and did it very assuredly. Although this type of shooting is not an accurate accounting of his ability, it did foreshadow that he will be a reliable enough shooter to alter floor spacing and warp game plans and scouting reports. Jackson Jr. was joyous and truly wanted to engage others. Memphis also seemed to be playing a few decibel levels harder than Atlanta.
The Warrior game against the Heat tonight didn’t showcase any tangible draft talent since Jacob Evans, the Warriors first round pick, was unable to play due to some kind of stubbed toe. He is expected to play tomorrow night. Bam Adebayo looked very good for Miami, and his ball handling ability seems to have drastically improved. He rebounded the ball physically as well.
Jordan Bell looked a bit out of sync without the usual cast of characters around him, and his attempts to go and create offense seemed disjointed and lacked a true conviction. Given the players surrounding him tonight though, none of which I’d heard of, it’s hard to connect. Warriors still won.
The most intriguing part of tonight was the matchup between the Sacramento Kings and the Lakers – a day after LeBron’s signing. There was an exuberance in the arena coming from both teams, and the Lakers are all of a sudden now playing for something different than they were when they woke up yesterday morning. Everything now will be scrutinized and filtered through the lens of LeBron.
The Kings have an assortment of players who, when they were in college, were some of my favorites. Frank Mason is a guard I have always admired. Fox is another guard who has looked stunning at times. Add Marvin Bagley and my man from Wisconsin and current Head Advocate of college players getting some sort of financial compensation, Nigel Hayes, and the Kings continue to tug at my heartstrings. Hayes plays like an old soul and he’s skilled. He likely won’t do one thing good enough to warrant making an NBA roster, but he does Everything so well and with such grace. He has unique intelligence and feel. He is musical.
They have the kid from North Carolina, the second-year player…Justin Jackson, although I’ve never been into him or his shot selection. Harry Giles is an under the radar player who still has never really done anything that hits the mark. He attempted and missed a three pointer tonight which looked as encouraging as anything I’ve ever seen from him.
Just in the last two draft classes the Kings have two Duke players, a North Carolina player (Jackson), a Kentucky player (Fox), and a Kansas player (Mason). When you add Vince Carter (North Carolina), Skal Labissiere (Kentucky), and Willie Cauley-Stein (Kentucky)…basically Sacramento has an NBA team chocked full of college blue bloods, and yet…
Bagley is going to provide an excitement in Sacramento. He yearns to connect and not only plays hard, he looks like he’s playing hard. He got up and dunked on Wagner tonight authoritatively, the Lakers first round pick, and did it with power and passion. It was not only a genuine display of Bagley’s athleticism, but also showcased a fearlessness which will only get more validated the more he plays. Right after the dunk he stepped into a three and hit it. When he finds his real confidence, he will be their most important player.
I still don’t see how Sac is going to piece it all together though. I only half-way tuned into the first half and, yeah, the pieces are sexy on paper and in warmups it all makes sense but, there’s always something missing.
Maybe it is lack of a cohesive vision when drafting. The Buddy Hield pick stands out as one where they could have nabbed someone with much more durability. It must also be said; the Giles pick needs to be given the opportunity to roost. Sac is on track to develop a deep and versatile frontcourt of young players. The guard-play is what will continue to be the question though, particularly at the point.
I think some of the Sacramento malaise has been coaching, coupled with the roster each coach had at their disposal. Mike Malone would have had success with the last few rosters – but even Rick Adelman would have been fired over the last 10 years given some of the roster compositions.
A few thoughts on the Lakers: Wagner will certainly be able to stretch the floor and can get loose from three. The question will be can he rebound his position well enough and obviously, defend? He seemed to be making more of a conscious effort to be physical, but he still does not understand how physical the league is. I think he has the temperament to figure it out, but he might need some tough love. His quickness seemed to be an issue tonight early in the game.
The Ukrainian kid from Kansas who I’ve always had an insider affinity for came out and blasted a three right off the get go. He’ll easily be able to shoot the ball in the NBA. I think it’s unlikely he makes the roster. He does have a chance though. It will be interesting to see how he develops playing against more D-league type of guys. There were moments tonight where he looked like he was playing in a college game with a bunch of college players on a floor with different dimensions, but I want to see him against older guys. He’s still young, 20 I think.
My last shout-out goes to Jonathan Williams – the Gonzaga power forward who is left handed, crafty and skilled, and has an original and still undecipherable personal disposition. He’s from Memphis and has old man game. I want to see how much of his NBA three-point ability has been explored. He had kind of a set-shot from three in college and it looked reliable. He has defensive intangibles and snatched a rebound tonight that looked big-time NBA. I really want him to make the roster. Again, it’s unlikely. He wasn’t even drafted, and I’m kicking myself for not having him on my draft night list if, for no other reason, I’ve always loved his game. He will be good in Europe if he ends up over there.
In the end, the Lakers have picked up a bunch of players I like which include Wagner and the Ukrainian kid. Jonathan Williams obviously I love. They pick up LEBRON which is a good move. They pick up JaVale McGee which is hard to poo-poo, and the Lance Stephenson pickup for the price tag seems like a shrewd move and something LeBron is likely cool with. All these players they are signing are on one-year deals, which creates maximum flexibility moving forward.
But the Lakers acquisition of Rajon Rondo is a move which troubles even the most unattached basketball observers. Let’s all get together, those of us who truly love basketball, and raise a couple hundred thousand dollars and commission a well-respected production company to produce a documentary on Rondo’s time in LA titled, “Confessions of an Argumentative and Physically Declining Cynic.”